Will AI replace training and development specialists?

AI already handles some of this work on its own in real use, for tasks like “Obtain, organize, or develop training procedure manuals, guides”. That's 2h 52m of a typical shift; 5h 8m still has no AI or robot evidence. BLS expects about 10.8% more of these jobs by 2035.

Time card for training and development specialists showing a typical 8-hour shift: 5h 8m done by people, 2h 52m by AI.
Each mark is 5 minutes of a typical shift for training and development specialists, colored by who does that task today. Estimates from O*NET tasks and Anthropic Economic Index data. How it's made

Home / Business & finance / Training and Development Specialists

Design or conduct work-related training and development programs to improve individual skills or organizational performance. May analyze organizational training needs or evaluate training effectiveness.

Time card

Untick tasks you don't do, or set your own times.
MineTask, by time spentHumanWith AIAIRobot
Present information with a variety of instructional techniques or formats, such as role playing, simulations, team exercises, group discussions, videos, or lectures.1h 32m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Obtain, organize, or develop training procedure manuals, guides, or course materials, such as handouts or visual materials.1h 20m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 10h 32m alone, 43m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Design, plan, organize, or direct orientation and training programs for employees or customers.49m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 11h 6m alone, 37m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Monitor, evaluate, or record training activities or program effectiveness.37m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Assess training needs through surveys, interviews with employees, focus groups, or consultation with managers, instructors, or customer representatives.31m a shift · Observed in AI use
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Attend meetings or seminars to obtain information for use in training programs or to inform management of training program status.31m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Offer specific training programs to help workers maintain or improve job skills.25m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Keep up with developments in area of expertise by reading current journals, books, or magazine articles.18m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Coordinate recruitment and placement of training program participants.18m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Evaluate modes of training delivery, such as in-person or virtual, to optimize training effectiveness, training costs, or environmental impacts.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Develop alternative training methods if expected improvements are not seen.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Evaluate training materials prepared by instructors, such as outlines, text, or handouts.12m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 3h 11m alone, 33m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Monitor training costs and prepare budget reports to justify expenditures.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Devise programs to develop executive potential among employees in lower-level positions.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Schedule classes based on availability of classrooms, equipment, or instructors.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Select and assign instructors to conduct training.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Negotiate contracts with clients for desired training outcomes, fees, or expenses.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Supervise, evaluate, or refer instructors to skill development classes.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Develop or implement training programs related to efficiency, recycling, or other issues with environmental impacts.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Refer trainees to employer relations representatives, to locations offering job placement assistance, or to appropriate social services agencies, if warranted.time not estimated · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work

Clock history

  1. 2h 52m touchedFirst published: O*NET 30.1, Anthropic Economic Index (2025 usage and September 2026 robot study), BLS May 2025

When new data changes this clock, the date, the new numbers and the reason are logged here. Company news alone never moves the clock.

On the floor

  1. AnnouncedSynthesia
    Synthesia launches AI avatar roleplay for employee training

    Synthesia launched Roleplay Sessions, where employees practice sales pitches and performance reviews with an AI avatar that scores them against a rubric. It is enterprise-only for now.

    TechCrunch

Ask the clock

Will AI replace training and development specialists?

Some tasks are already being done by AI or machines; the rest still needs a person. About 2h 52m of a typical shift is made up of tasks that AI or robots have done on their own in real use somewhere. That doesn't mean those hours are automated in a typical workplace. The other 5h 8m (64%) stays with people. Separately, BLS expects about 10.8% more of these jobs by 2035 (all jobs: +3.5%).

What can AI already do for training and development specialists?

AI shows up regularly in 4 of 20 tasks, about 2h 52m of a typical shift. The biggest ones:

  • Obtain, organize, or develop training procedure manuals, guides, or course materials, such as handouts or visual materials. (1h 20m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
  • Design, plan, organize, or direct orientation and training programs for employees or customers. (49m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
  • Assess training needs through surveys, interviews with employees, focus groups, or consultation with managers, instructors, or customer representatives. (31m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
  • Evaluate training materials prepared by instructors, such as outlines, text, or handouts. (12m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
What still needs a person?

5h 8m of a typical shift, or 64%, goes to tasks with no AI or robot evidence yet. No AI usage or robot deployment has shown up for these so far. The biggest:

  • Present information with a variety of instructional techniques or formats, such as role playing, simulations, team exercises, group discussions, videos, or lectures. (1h 32m a shift)
  • Monitor, evaluate, or record training activities or program effectiveness. (37m a shift)
  • Attend meetings or seminars to obtain information for use in training programs or to inform management of training program status. (31m a shift)
  • Offer specific training programs to help workers maintain or improve job skills. (25m a shift)
  • Keep up with developments in area of expertise by reading current journals, books, or magazine articles. (18m a shift)
Why is that work hard to automate?

Much of it comes down to where and how the work happens. In-person, hands-on and high-stakes work is where AI and robots have made the least headway so far. In the official O*NET survey of people in this job:

  • 65% are in constant contact with other people
  • 52% talk face to face with others every day
What are companies actually doing?

We track 1 sourced company move that affects this job. Most recent:

  • Jul 22, 2026: Synthesia launches AI avatar roleplay for employee training (Announced)
How much time does AI save on these tasks?

For the 3 tasks in this job where AI shows up and timing data exists, a typical request takes about 10h 32m for a person alone and about 37m with AI. These are Claude's own estimates from real conversations in April and May 2026 (Anthropic Economic Index). They describe single requests, not whole workdays, and time saved on a task doesn't mean jobs are cut. The biggest gaps:

  • Design, plan, organize, or direct orientation and training programs for employees or customers (about 11h 6m alone, 37m with AI)
  • Obtain, organize, or develop training procedure manuals, guides, or course materials, such as handouts or visual materials (about 10h 32m alone, 43m with AI)
  • Evaluate training materials prepared by instructors, such as outlines, text, or handouts (about 3h 11m alone, 33m with AI)
Are employers still hiring training and development specialists?

On Indeed, job postings in the Human Resources sector are at 99% of their February 2020 level (all U.S. postings: 104%), up 18.9% from a year earlier, as of Oct 9, 2026. BLS separately expects about 46,000 openings a year in this job through 2035. Across all U.S. postings, 7.3% now mention AI skills. Sector postings cover more than this one job and move for many reasons besides AI.

How much do training and development specialists make?

The median pay is about $69,280 a year ($33.31 an hour), 36% above the median for all U.S. jobs ($50,980). Most people in this job earn between $38,760 and $123,250 a year; that range covers the middle 80%. Pay figures are from BLS, May 2025, and vary a lot by state and employer. Pick a state to compare:

Is this job growing or shrinking?

BLS projects growth of 10.8% from 2025 to 2035, compared with 3.5% growth for all jobs. That's about 524,000 jobs in 2035. It expects about 46,000 openings a year, mostly from people retiring or changing careers. These projections don't single out AI as a cause.

How many training and development specialists are there in the U.S.?

About 458,000 people in the U.S., roughly 0.29% of all workers (BLS, May 2025). That makes it the 90th largest of the 796 jobs on this site. BLS expects about 524,000 in 2035.

What training do training and development specialists need?

The most common requirement is a bachelor's degree: about 78% of people in the job said so in the official O*NET survey. O*NET rates the job at level 4 of 5 for preparation, which usually means: bachelor's degree. Requirements vary by state and employer, especially for licensed work.

What should I learn to stay ahead of AI?

These come from the job's official skill ratings and from the tasks that AI and robots touch least today. Building them keeps you strong in the parts of the work that still need a person:

  • Skills that matter more here than in most jobs: Instructing, Learning Strategies, Social Perceptiveness, Operations Analysis
  • Get strong at the parts of the job that stay with people (listed above), which take 5h 8m of a typical shift
  • Tools employers list: Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Office software, Microsoft Excel
  • Learn to use AI well on the tasks where it already shows up in this job (listed above)
What other jobs could training and development specialists move into?

These use similar skills. Matches come from 109 official ratings of skills, knowledge and work activities, and each needs the same or less preparation unless the official list relates the jobs directly:

  • Training and Development Managers (4h 13m touched, $133k median pay)
  • Instructional Coordinators (2h 59m touched, $77k median pay)
  • Industrial-Organizational Psychologists (1h 51m touched, $194k median pay)
  • Management Analysts (3h 2m touched, $102k median pay)
How solid are these numbers?

Each task carries its own evidence label. For this job: 4 observed in real AI use, 16 with no AI or robot evidence found. The minutes per task are estimates, not measured hours, and "no evidence" doesn't prove a task is safe.

Tools in demand

  • Adobe Acrobat
  • Adobe After Effects
  • Adobe Creative Cloud software

Plus everyday office tools: Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Office software, Microsoft Excel.

Also called

Applications Trainer, Apprenticeship and Training Representative, Auxiliary Personnel Inservice Coordinator, Bilingual Trainer, Certified EPIC Trainer (Certified Electronic Privacy Information Center Trainer), Computer Software Training Specialist, Computer Technology Trainer, Computer Training Specialist, Corporate Trainer, Course Developer, Courseware Developer, Curriculum Developer, Curriculum Writer, Cyber Instructional Curriculum Developer