Will AI replace software quality assurance analysts and testers?

AI already handles some of this work on its own in real use, for tasks like “Test system modifications to prepare for implementation”. That's 3h 26m of a typical shift; 4h 34m still has no AI or robot evidence. BLS expects about 5.7% more of these jobs by 2035.

Time card for software quality assurance analysts and testers showing a typical 8-hour shift: 4h 34m done by people, 3h 26m by AI.
Each mark is 5 minutes of a typical shift for software quality assurance analysts and testers, colored by who does that task today. Estimates from O*NET tasks and Anthropic Economic Index data. How it's made

Home / Computers & math / Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers

Develop and execute software tests to identify software problems and their causes. Test system modifications to prepare for implementation. Document software and application defects using a bug tracking system and report defects to software or web developers. Create and maintain databases of known defects. May participate in software design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, operational characteristics, product designs, and schedules.

Time card

Untick tasks you don't do, or set your own times.
MineTask, by time spentHumanWith AIAIRobot
Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content.1h 2m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Test system modifications to prepare for implementation.44m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 2h 58m alone, 32m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers.37m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 6h 7m alone, 34m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability.37m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Design test plans, scenarios, scripts, or procedures.37m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Update automated test scripts to ensure currency.25m a shift · Observed in AI use
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards.19m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality.19m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 6h 40m alone, 59m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Monitor bug resolution efforts and track successes.19m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 3h 58m alone, 38m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Perform initial debugging procedures by reviewing configuration files, logs, or code pieces to determine breakdown source.19m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 4h 54m alone, 45m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Install, maintain, or use software testing programs.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Develop or specify standards, methods, or procedures to determine product quality or release readiness.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Participate in product design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, product designs, schedules, or potential problems.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Plan test schedules or strategies in accordance with project scope or delivery dates.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Conduct software compatibility tests with programs, hardware, operating systems, or network environments.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Design or develop automated testing tools.12m a shift · Observed in AI use
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Install and configure recreations of software production environments to allow testing of software performance.12m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Create or maintain databases of known test defects.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Investigate customer problems referred by technical support.6m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 2h 5m alone, 30m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Review software documentation to ensure technical accuracy, compliance, or completeness, or to mitigate risks.6m a shift · Observed in AI use
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Identify program deviance from standards, and suggest modifications to ensure compliance.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Collaborate with field staff or customers to evaluate or diagnose problems and recommend possible solutions.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Coordinate user or third-party testing.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Conduct historical analyses of test results.6m a shift · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Evaluate or recommend software for testing or bug tracking.6m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 2h 52m alone, 25m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Modify existing software to correct errors, allow it to adapt to new hardware, or to improve its performance.6m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 4h 58m alone, 42m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements.6m a shift · Observed in AI useTypical AI request: about 7h 17m alone, 40m with AI
Why this label?Marked AI because this task shows up regularly in real AI conversations (Anthropic Economic Index, 2025 usage), and in most of them AI does the task on its own rather than helping a person. Many workplaces may not use AI for it at all. How labels work
Visit beta testing sites to evaluate software performance.time not estimated · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work
Recommend purchase of equipment to control dust, temperature, or humidity in area of system installation.time not estimated · No AI or robot evidence found
Why this label?No AI use or robot deployment showed up for this task in our data. That isn't proof it's safe; it may just be rare in the data. How labels work

Clock history

  1. 3h 26m touchedFirst published: O*NET 30.1, Anthropic Economic Index (2025 usage and September 2026 robot study), BLS May 2025

When new data changes this clock, the date, the new numbers and the reason are logged here. Company news alone never moves the clock.

On the floor

  1. Rolling outPricer
    Pricer uses AI test agents after QA team shrinks from 8 to 2

    After a restructuring cut its QA team from 8 people to 2, Pricer adopted QA.tech agents that create, update and run tests on every pull request. The vendor case study says about 390 hours of testing are saved per quarter.

    QA.tech case study

Ask the clock

Will AI replace software quality assurance analysts and testers?

Some tasks are already being done by AI or machines; the rest still needs a person. About 3h 26m of a typical shift is made up of tasks that AI or robots have done on their own in real use somewhere. That doesn't mean those hours are automated in a typical workplace. The other 4h 34m (57%) stays with people. Separately, BLS expects about 5.7% more of these jobs by 2035 (all jobs: +3.5%).

What can AI already do for software quality assurance analysts and testers?

AI shows up regularly in 12 of 30 tasks, about 3h 26m of a typical shift. The biggest ones:

  • Test system modifications to prepare for implementation. (44m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
  • Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers. (37m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
  • Update automated test scripts to ensure currency. (25m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
  • Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality. (19m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
  • Monitor bug resolution efforts and track successes. (19m a shift, AI mostly does it alone)
What still needs a person?

4h 34m of a typical shift, or 57%, goes to tasks with no AI or robot evidence yet. No AI usage or robot deployment has shown up for these so far. The biggest:

  • Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content. (1h 2m a shift)
  • Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability. (37m a shift)
  • Design test plans, scenarios, scripts, or procedures. (37m a shift)
  • Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards. (19m a shift)
  • Install, maintain, or use software testing programs. (12m a shift)
Why is that work hard to automate?

Much of it comes down to where and how the work happens. In-person, hands-on and high-stakes work is where AI and robots have made the least headway so far. In the official O*NET survey of people in this job:

  • 75% talk face to face with others every day
What are companies actually doing?

We track 1 sourced company move that affects this job. Most recent:

  • Mar 5, 2026: Pricer uses AI test agents after QA team shrinks from 8 to 2 (Rolling out)
How much time does AI save on these tasks?

For the 9 tasks in this job where AI shows up and timing data exists, a typical request takes about 4h 54m for a person alone and about 38m with AI. These are Claude's own estimates from real conversations in April and May 2026 (Anthropic Economic Index). They describe single requests, not whole workdays, and time saved on a task doesn't mean jobs are cut. The biggest gaps:

  • Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements (about 7h 17m alone, 40m with AI)
  • Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality (about 6h 40m alone, 59m with AI)
  • Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers (about 6h 7m alone, 34m with AI)
Are employers still hiring software quality assurance analysts and testers?

On Indeed, job postings in the Software Development sector are at 78% of their February 2020 level (all U.S. postings: 104%), up 21.5% from a year earlier, as of Oct 9, 2026. BLS separately expects about 11,000 openings a year in this job through 2035. Across all U.S. postings, 7.3% now mention AI skills. Sector postings cover more than this one job and move for many reasons besides AI.

How much do software quality assurance analysts and testers make?

The median pay is about $104,300 a year ($50.14 an hour), 105% above the median for all U.S. jobs ($50,980). Most people in this job earn between $61,440 and $167,010 a year; that range covers the middle 80%. Pay figures are from BLS, May 2025, and vary a lot by state and employer. Pick a state to compare:

Is this job growing or shrinking?

BLS projects growth of 5.7% from 2025 to 2035, compared with 3.5% growth for all jobs. That's about 198,000 jobs in 2035. It expects about 11,000 openings a year, mostly from people retiring or changing careers. These projections don't single out AI as a cause.

How many software quality assurance analysts and testers are there in the U.S.?

About 187,000 people in the U.S., roughly 0.12% of all workers (BLS, May 2025). That makes it the 179th largest of the 796 jobs on this site. BLS expects about 198,000 in 2035.

What training do software quality assurance analysts and testers need?

The most common requirement is a bachelor's degree: about 50% of people in the job said so in the official O*NET survey. O*NET rates the job at level 4 of 5 for preparation, which usually means: bachelor's degree. Requirements vary by state and employer, especially for licensed work.

What should I learn to stay ahead of AI?

These come from the job's official skill ratings and from the tasks that AI and robots touch least today. Building them keeps you strong in the parts of the work that still need a person:

  • Skills that matter more here than in most jobs: Programming, Operations Analysis, Quality Control Analysis, Systems Evaluation
  • Get strong at the parts of the job that stay with people (listed above), which take 4h 34m of a typical shift
  • Tools employers list: Structured query language SQL, Selenium, Python, Oracle Java, Microsoft Office software
  • Learn to use AI well on the tasks where it already shows up in this job (listed above)
What other jobs could software quality assurance analysts and testers move into?

These use similar skills, with less of a typical shift touched by AI or robots. Matches come from 109 official ratings of skills, knowledge and work activities, and each needs the same or less preparation unless the official list relates the jobs directly:

  • Information Security Engineers (17m touched, $117k median pay)
  • Clinical Data Managers (2h 18m touched, $120k median pay)
How solid are these numbers?

Each task carries its own evidence label. For this job: 12 observed in real AI use, 18 with no AI or robot evidence found. The minutes per task are estimates, not measured hours, and "no evidence" doesn't prove a task is safe.

Tools in demand

  • Structured query language SQL
  • Selenium
  • Python
  • Oracle Java
  • Microsoft Azure software
  • Linux

Plus everyday office tools: Microsoft Office software, Microsoft Excel.

Also called

Application Integrator, Applications Analyst, Applications Quality Assurance Specialist (Applications QA Specialist), Applications Software Engineering Information Technology Specialist (Applications Software Engineering IT Specialist), Applications System Analyst, Applications Tester, Automation Tester, Beta Tester, Bug Bounty Hunter, Computer Consultant, Data Modeler, Game Tester, IT Performance Analyst (Information Technology Performance Analyst), Implementation Specialist